Essay feedback before you submit.

Thesis and argument: The position is clear and stated early: "homework should not be banned completely, but it should be reduced and made more meaningful." The essay stays on this line to the end, and the counterargument about students without a quiet place to study is handled fairly. The argument for "reduced" is stronger than the argument for "more meaningful", which gets only one sentence about copying from the textbook.

Use of evidence: This is the weakest criterion. "Studies have shown that tired students learn less" has no study, author or figure behind it. Claims such as "many students would forget the lesson by the next day" and "habits that will help them in college and at work" are plausible but unsupported. The India example is the only concrete detail, and it also lacks a source.

Structure and coherence: The structure is clean: introduction, two points in favour, the case against, a counterargument, a conclusion. Paragraphs are focused and transitions are simple. The "On the other hand" paragraph carries the most weight but gets no more development than the short paragraphs on practice and responsibility.

Accuracy: There are no obvious errors. "Has been part of school life for as long as anyone can remember" is a loose generalisation, and "millions of students" is unsourced.

Academic style: The register is appropriate and readable. The opening is somewhat generic, and "everyone knows" type framing is better replaced with a specific fact.

Referencing: There are no citations or references at all, which is the main gap for an academic essay.

By this rubric it reads as B- / B. Adding two or three real, cited sources for the claims about stress, sleep and homework effectiveness would move it toward an A-.

• Evidence is the biggest gap. You write "Studies have shown that tired students learn less" and "Without practice at home, many students would forget the lesson by the next day", but you cite no study, author or source, so by this rubric both read as unsupported assertions. Name a real source in your own referencing format, or soften the claim to something you can defend. Do the same for the India claim: "Many students in India spend six or seven hours in school" needs a source or a clearly marked estimate.

• Your argument is one-sided in the body. The thesis promises "reduced and made more meaningful", yet the two "First/Second" paragraphs only praise homework. Add one concrete example of what a "meaningful" task looks like, because "make sure every task has a purpose" in the conclusion stays abstract. Right now the thesis is stronger than the support behind it.

• The counterargument is raised but not answered well. In "Schools can offer study rooms after class, and teachers can give tasks that students can do on their own", the second half repeats the problem instead of solving it. Explain how such tasks would work, and say who would pay for or staff the study rooms.

• Structure: the pros and cons are in separate blocks, but "On the other hand" starts the longest paragraph without linking back to your thesis. Add a sentence there showing that the harm comes from amount and quality, which is exactly what you propose to fix.

• Style: "for as long as anyone can remember" and "millions of students" are broad and unsourced. Replace them with something precise or cut them.

• Referencing: there is no in-text citation or reference list anywhere, which an academic reader will notice first.